a. This text surprised me because I hadn't realized how much can go into a comment that could help and that the editor should think of external circumstances while editing and making comments, I had thought that all the comments should be done during one round of editing.
b. The strategies in this text can surely help in peer review. Using more specific comments and writing the question out fully instead of stating "confusing" seems extremely helpful and will benefit both the writer and the reader since the writer knows specifically what is confusing and the reader can try to fix similar clarity problems in their own paper. Considering the writers personality outside of the paper is something I had not thought to do since their writing doesn't have to do with their personality but I do like the idea of using it as a tool to help them even past helping their paper.
c. I have done peer review in the past. It was often a positive experience in that the comments would direct me to notice some errors I had missed but they were not entirely clear in what could be done to make it better as a piece of work.
No comments:
Post a Comment